Good(ish) rejection

Like all writers, I get far more rejection notes than acceptances. It’s just part of the process of being a writer, and nearly all of them, regardless of the words, are just a way of saying “no, we’re not going to publish this story”: mark it in the submission log, find another potential market for the story, and move on. Today, however, I received a very surprising rejection. The first two paragraphs are just standard form rejection, but then the editor appended this third paragraph:

Personal note: This was a fascinating and experimental piece to read. It was unpredictably and beautifully eerie. Your prose succeeds at building and sustaining the tension driving this story.

Other than the in-person rejections from friends, this is the nicest I’ve ever received. In the long run, it doesn’t really matter: the story still hasn’t sold, and the rejection isn’t going to make it any easier to sell the story, but for a few moments today, it feels nice.

Tough Trivia, 4/12/21

I’m planning for Tough Trivia to be a daily feature on this blog (well, Monday to Friday). Each day, I’ll post a tough trivia question. The next day, I’ll post the answer to the previous day’s question and a new question.

At some point, I’ll award a prize for the most correct answers, and another for the most regular participant. And maybe something for the funniest or most amusing wrong answer. If you want to participate, simply comment on the day’s post. I won’t approve the comments until after the next day’s entry is posted.

800px-USA_declaration_independenceAnd while this is the age of the internet, and you can probably do a web search and find the right answers to each question, where’s the fun in that? I can’t make you not look it up, but don’t.

So, let’s kick things off with a history question:

Everybody remembers “When in the course of human events” and “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” July 4, 1776, and John Hancock. That it was Thomas Jefferson’s wordsmithing which put the words in that document. But the Declaration of Independence wouldn’t have meant anything if it wasn’t adopted by the 13 colonies and signed by their 56 representatives. Including John Hancock in his state’s delegation, which state had the most signatories, and which state the fewest? Bonus points if you can list the number of signatories for each state.

The anti-ellipsis?

Having a texting conversation with a new friend, and one of the topics is grammar and punctuation (don’t laugh; some of us find it interesting). I gave a brief disquisition on the ellipsis. The next day (after thinking about it), she said “The ellipsis seems to be about leaving: leaving things off, leaving things out… Is there a mark about coming back?” I didn’t have an answer for that. Do you?

Amelie

Amelie_posterI just saw the movie Amelie. How did I not see this earlier?! It’s wonderful! I love the surrealism of it, and the incredible details that actually have nothing to do with the main story, except as a means of showing the import of little details that we tend to ignore. It reminded me (at least, the detail-ness of it) of Stranger Than Fiction (which I shouldn’t have liked so much, but did) and the great parts of The Princess Bride (the book, not the movie). It’s those details, and the strong narrator, that I love so much and want to figure out how to work into my fiction, though I still haven’t gotten to that stage (although I have noticed myself dropping in some of those detail-esque references in my recent stories; I guess it’s just a slow evolution).

theprincessbrideNow I’m processing the movie, absorbing it, thinking I want to watch it again. But my French isn’t nearly good enough; I’d have to again read all the subtitles. That isn’t really a problem, except that it pretty much forces me to only watch the movie, and not do anything else at the same time, as I normally do when I’m “watching” reruns on tv.

Horror for the Throne will scare… it right out of you

A press release from Fantastic Books:

horrorforthethronefrontDelayed for a year due to the pandemic (which is itself a horror), Fantastic Books is now terrified to announce the impending publication of Horror for the Throne: One-Sitting Reads, the third in our highly successful series of anthologies of very short stories. Being released on July 15, (beware the Ides of July), Horror for the Throne once again invites readers to sit down and take notice.

Editors Tom Easton and Judith K. Dial are joined this time by Mythopoeic Award-winner James D. Macdonald, presenting forty short stories guaranteed to scare… it right out of you.

Amazing Stories said the first volume (Science Fiction for the Throne) is “not a book to try and read in one sitting (as I largely did). It is what I sometimes refer to as ‘a dipping book:’ for maximum effect, you should read a story or two here, a story or two there, a story or two somewhere else.” Hugo-winner Allen Steele said “For the bathroom, for the bedroom, for the bus to work, for that chair in the department store where bored spouses sit while their wives or husbands try on new clothes… this is a perfect way to entertain yourself during idle moments in a way that won’t rot your mind. Read this and have fun.”

Asimov’s Science Fiction said the second volume, Fantasy for the Throne, is “a fun collection, exactly right for those moments when you have just a few minutes to read.” While Analog Science Fiction and Fact called it “a little gem. Or rather, here are 40 little gems by as many authors, all packaged in one sweet volume.”

Get your blood pumping with forty bite-sized doses of horror fiction. Horror for the Throne is the third in an ongoing series of One-Sitting Reads. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

Horror for the Throne: One-Sitting Reads
edited by James D. Macdonald, Tom Easton, and Judith K. Dial
Fantastic Books. 176 pages. Simultaneous publication date: July 15, 2021
trade paperback: $14.99. ISBN: 978-1-5154-2409-3.
case laminate hardcover: $22.99. ISBN: 978-1-5154-2410-3.

Review copies are available upon request.

Horror for the Throne—and all Fantastic Books publications—are distributed through Ingram, and available through all major online retailers. Fantastic Books is also happy to accept orders directly from independent book stores.

Horror for the Throne features stories by: E.C. Ambrose, Colleen Anderson, Kevin David Anderson, Diane Arrelle, Stewart C. Baker, T.L. Barrett, James Blakey, Bruce Boston, Michael Bracken, Tiffany Michelle Brown, Elliot Capon, Jeff C. Carter, Gregg Chamberlain, Brenda Clough, Ian Creasey, Steve Dillon, Stephanie Ellis, Kevin M. Folliard, Eric J. Guignard, Liam Hogan, Emma Johnson-Rivard, Randee Dawn Kestenbaum, Daniel M. Kimmel, Chris Kuriata, Geoffrey A. Landis, Sharon Lee, Gordon Linzner, Nicola Lombardi, Linda Silverman McMullen, Gregory Nicoll, Brian Rappatta, Gary L. Robbs, Chuck Rothman, Steve Rasnic Tem, Mark Towse, Mary A. Turzillo, Douglas A. Van Belle, Marie Vibbert, Dawn Vogel, and Marcia Wilson.

Still having trouble texting

Once again, I’m reminded of how text “conversations” make me uncomfortable. When my correspondent stops responding, I never know if it’s because my correspondent was distracted by something else, or tired of the conversation, or if I’ve said something that made my correspondent simply want to stop responding. Intellectually, I know I’m rarely so appalling in what I text, but that worry is always in my mind, and I wind up going over the last text I sent several times to make sure I haven’t said anything too untoward.

Yes, yes, I know: texting is one continual conversation with randomly spaced lacunae which can last from moments to days, but my “face-to-face conversation” brain still wants some sort of signal, that this is simply a pause, not a permanent end.

Ships not moving

Ever_Given_Suez_Canal_24_March_2021
Container ship Ever Given stuck in the Suez Canal on March 24, 2021.

I was just looking at the story Evergreen Lines’ container ship Ever Given, the ship which is currently stuck in the Suez Canal. That lead me to this Wikipedia article on the Yellow Fleet, which I’d probably heard of, but forgotten. The Yellow Fleet were the fifteen ships trapped by the Six Day War in the Suez Canal from 1967 to 1975. An interesting story from days gone by.

TKAT: March 17, 2021

In the realm of “Well, that’s interesting (stock market edition),” take a look at the stock of Takung Art Co., Ltd., today. It trades on the American Stock Exchange with the ticker symbol TKAT. Takung operates an electronic online platform for artists, dealers, and collectors to buy and sell artwork primarily in the People’s Republic of China. It pays no dividends, and reports no earnings.

After trading between $1 and $2 a share for all of last year, it jumped at the beginning of this year to about $2.50, and has slowly been trending up the last two months. At the end of the day Monday, it jumped to $9, and then yesterday ranged between $6 and $7, closing at $5.99. Just after 11 o’clock this morning, somebody noticed it. Or perhaps a lot of somebodies. It peaked today at $24.90, and finished the day at $22.60. There are a total of 11,271,000 shares outstanding, and the 90-day average trading volume, until today, was just under 588,000 shares per day. Today, it traded just over 66 million shares. Put another way, every single share of the company in circulation changed hands six times today.

I don’t own it, and don’t feel any need to buy this stock (except, possibly, if I could buy it yesterday), but it is interesting to look at.

I miss talking

I just gave my talk on “Inaugurations and Installations: Presidents’ First Days on the Job” to New Hampshire Mensa. I love being on stage: there’s an adrenaline rush to it. Even doing it remotely, there’s a taste of that rush, but it’s muted. Sure, like everyone, I miss seeing people, going out, doing things outside the house, travel, everything we’ll be doing once we get the pandemic under control. But talking to a room full of people, feeding off their energy and interest, bantering with them during the question-and-answer session, the small-group conversations afterward, and the relaxation after I’m done, sometimes with a meal or a drink or just socializing… I think that’s the part I’m missing the most.

Thanks for giving me the taste, New Hampshire Mensa and those of you who were in my virtual audience.

And everyone else: I’m available if your group is looking for a speaker.

For those who asked, here are the links to my two latest versions of the book on presidential inaugural speeches:

The Complete Book of Presidential Inaugural Speeches, from George Washington to Joe Biden

The Complete Book of Presidential Inaugural Speeches, from George Washington to Joe Biden (Special Trump-less Edition)

Stop Treating the Republicans Like Buffoons; It’s Not a Winning Strategy

I was just listening to the talking heads on MSNBC (tuned in late, so I didn’t hear who they were). They exemplified for me, yet again, why the Democratic Party can have more registered voters, can even win elections, and still manage to be its own worst enemy.

The talking heads today were laughing about the Republican Party. In their view, the Republican Party doesn’t stand for anything, so it can’t possibly attract enough votes to win anything. One of them said “I think the Republican Party is going to have to be spanked again — they’re probably going to lose 25 seats in the election of 2022, reversing all historical trends for presidents losing seats in the midterm — before they wake up and realize they don’t stand for anything, and that they have to get rid of Donald Trump.”

And why did this catch my ear? Because I’ve been hearing dyed-in-the-wool Democrats say exactly the same thing for two decades. A political reporter friend of mine, twenty years ago, told me that the Republican Party was dying and would soon be dead. “Look at the last presidential elections,” he said to me then, in the aftermath of the election of 2000. “The last time the Republicans won a majority of the popular vote was in 1988. They’re dying.” It’s now five elections farther on. The Republican candidate won a majority of the popular vote only once more, in 2004. And yet there has been a Republican in the White House 60% of the time since he told me the party was dying.

It goes farther. We’ve had ten Congresses since the election of 2000, twenty years. In that time, the Senate had a Democratic majority for five Congresses, ten years, half the time, and a Republican majority the other half of the time. In the House of Representatives, there was a Democratic majority for only three Congresses, six years; the Republicans held the majority seventy percent of the time. And in this most recent election, which the staunch Democrats hail as a victory in retaking the Senate, look a little deeper. Consider the popular votes for each of the contested Senate seats in the elections of 2020. You may be as surprised as I was that the popular vote totals in all those elections combined are pretty darn close to 50–50, Republican and Democrat. The 50 Republicans in the Senate are not merely an artifact of two Senators per state regardless of size. There really are almost as many people voting for Republicans as for Democrats. And yes, I know, I’m playing with data. Of the four most populous states, only one had a Senate seat up for election in 2020. But my point remains: laughing off the Republicans is not a winning strategy.

Consider the election of 2016. How did the Republican candidate win the presidency? He won because the Democratic presidential campaign got complacent. They decided the goal was to run up the popular vote total, rather than remembering the rules of the game. Whether you like it or not, we have an electoral college, and the way to be elected President is to win the electoral college. That’s what the Republicans did in 2016.

Yes, the Republicans are acting like both thugs and buffoons. Their massive campaign to make it more difficult to vote is thuggish behavior of the most transparent and abhorrent sort. And their refusal to even adopt a campaign platform for the election of 2020 shows what a joke the party’s leaders think their party has become, that instead of publicly standing for issues, they’ll simply follow their chosen god-figure.

But if the Democrats are serious about enacting good, long-lasting changes, making things better for us all, they’re going to have to do far more than laugh at the Republican Party and demonize its chosen leaders. They’re going to have to be serious, they’re going to have to win over the undecided, middle-of-the-political-spectrum voters who hold our noses each time we vote for a Republican or a Democrat. I’m still ashamed to admit I voted against Donald Trump, rather than for Joe Biden, but both parties are most effective at pushing me toward the other, rather than drawing me to themselves.

And while President Biden does seem to be talking the talk, he’s going to have to get the rest of his supporting cast on board. The laugh fest I saw today is emblematic of one of the Democrats’ main problems. I may agree with them, that Donald Trump is a jerk and Mitch McConnell is a liar, but repeating that is not a reason that will convince voters to go for the Democrat in 2022 or 2024. And they’d better not be deluding themselves that “anyone who thinks can see that.” It’s like commercials advertising the “best-selling whatever”: popularity is not a rational reason to buy something, but people do it because they want to be associated with the winner. Donald Trump is a schmuck, but he presents himself — and a lot of people seem him — as a winner. The Democrats are not going to be able to tear that down with their laughter (though Trump may do it to himself); they’re going to need to show that they are effective winners.

And now, as I’ve finished writing this, MSNBC is starting its 5 o’clock program talking about “A GOP that has gutted itself,” pointing to their loss of the Senate and the White House. Those talking heads are delusional.