Where are reviewers hiding?

When I worked for Analog and Asimov’s, we had a perennial question: Analog routinely outsold Asimov’s by five or ten percent, but when it came to awards time, stories from Asimov’s always got lots of nominations and awards, while Analog garnered almost none. We knew Analog readers actually read the stories, because they wrote letters and kept renewing their subscriptions; they simply weren’t people who were interested in nominating or voting for awards. And I felt badly for the writers who didn’t see that external recognition, but there was nothing we could do to convince those readers to get into the award-nominating and -voting mindset.

Now I’m experiencing something similar, but not talking about awards. I know Fantastic Books books are selling and being read. For instance, the anthology Resistance was the #1 new release in American Literature Anthologies on Amazon, it is selling copies, and several readers have commented to me on individual stories in the book. But like most of the books my company publishes, it was yet to see a single reader review on either Amazon or GoodReads, or LibraryThing, or anywhere else I can find.

In the modern bookselling world, reader reviews are important. They make books more findable, increase their visibility on the bookselling platforms, and apparently translate to better sales numbers. But I have simply not been able to figure out why my readers are among those who don’t post reader reviews. In the old days, at Analog and Asimov’s, those readers who wanted to comment on stories had to write physical letters, in envelopes with stamps sent through the mail, and they did: we received dozens of letters every week. But today, those reader reviews are as simple as “click here, click a number of stars, type a couple of words.” Literally, just four or five words is sufficient: “I liked the book.” or “The story with the AI was cool.” And yet, nothing.

So I’m asking y’all: how do you urge readers to write those reviews? Or for those of you who do: what urges you to write a review?

“Winning” the Trump-Iran War is Going to Cost the World a Lot of Money

If this article is the straight poop, then the biggest lasting effect of the Trump-Iran War seems to be the US granting Iran (and to a lesser degree, Oman) the right to charge tolls for passage through the Strait of Hormuz. In other words, Donald Trump started a war which will result in the rest of the world having to pay more money to Iran. Good job, Mr. President.

Specifically, paragraph 5 says “Upon the signing of this MOU, Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.”

Lesser issues: the US is paying $300 billion to rebuild Iran (anyone remember The Mouse that Roared?), and terminating ALL sanctions on Iran.

Go ahead, read it: this agreement says that Iran is giving up its ambitions for nuclear weapons (paragraph 8). Every other paragraph is what the United States is giving Iran. That joke going around, about the Supreme Leader’s “Art of the Deal” book doesn’t look too funny now.

AI: financial bubble, or the new big thing?

Financial discussion question: I’ve been watching the stock market indices flying, driven mainly by the AI trades: Nvidia, Intel, Micron—all the companies making the hardware on which AI systems run. And lots of AI companies are doing well. But what I’m not seeing is the case for the long-term profitability (or indeed, any profitability) for the companies that are creating the AI systems: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and so on. Other than selling those programs to companies to use themselves to theoretically increase their efficiency (or to enable them to fire low-level workers), is there any real profit to be made in AI? An auto manufacturer makes and sells cars: there’s a clear product that will bring in profit, and there are clear add-ons and supplements that can increase that profit. A clothing manufacturer, ditto. Even the various software companies: give away an electronic game and sell in-app things. It may be fuzzy, but there’s a clearly defined product that can make money in a clearly defined manner with fairly clear parameters.

But when I look at internet-esque things which are given away for free, I think first of Google and the other search engines: they make their money through selling advertising. Ditto Facebook, Twitter, and all the others. Are we expecting the various AI engines to also be selling advertising? What is the income-making thing they’re going to be selling?

Or is the last several months of stock market gains nothing more than the AI bubble? The latest incarnation of Alan Greenspan’s Irrational Exuberance?

(Please note: this is not a request for the list of why AI is evil or how wonderful AI will be when it’s perfected. I’m looking at the business case for AI, if there is one, and if any of the money being thrown at it is rational, if it might logically anticipate a return of some sort.)

Do good fences make good strangers?

Michael Smerconish, on his CNN Sunday program, just had a story about homeowners wanting fewer white picket fences and more taller, privacy fences (I tuned in part-way through, and so missed the introduction of his guest who wrote the article that caught his attention and caused him to tell the story). He mentioned that fences break up the landscape, separate us from our neighbors, and so forth. That resonated with me.

I get a similar feeling in dealers’ rooms at the conventions I attend. Way back when, dealers would have their wares on tables, and customers would look at those wares, but could glance up to see across the room, see all the people and tables. And we dealers could see each other, look around to see if there were crowds of customers somewhere in the room even if they weren’t at our tables, subconsciously feel we were all in it together. But over the last bunch of years, table displays have gotten taller and more complex, with huge banners back-stopping the table. Lines of tables all together in a room have turned into series of caves. The aisles between the tables have turned into deep chasms, with nothing visible except the few at arm’s length and the ceiling above. We’ve lost sight of all the other dealers except the one directly across the aisle, and I feel so closed in, almost claustrophobic.

During the story, Smerconish quoted the phrase “good fences make good neighbors,” which we’ve all heard. But do we ever consider the rest of the poem (“Mending Wall” by Robert Frost) in which the phrase appears? Indeed, the speaker of “good fences make good neighbors” never explains what he means or why. But the narrator, talking with him, goes on to ponder

Why do they make good neighbours? Isn’t it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I’d ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out.…

Are fences—in general—a response to our increasingly electronically connected world? Is it that we let everyone into our lives on our screens, so we feel a greater need to keep them out of our physical spaces? I can sort of accept that reasoning. But in the dealers’ rooms, I just find it uncomfortable. I’ve found that, when I’m setting up my table in the middle of a row, I won’t put up my large banners behind me until the vendor backing my table has set up and erected whatever large display will be there, facing the other aisle, walling me out. And in the rare event that my back-to-back neighbor does not have a sight-line cutting display, I won’t put up the banners. It’s my little protest against the walling off, the sectioning off, of the dealers’ room.

Perhaps, being taller than average, I have a different view of such things. On a crowded subway car, my face isn’t pressed into my neighbor’s back; I can see above all the heads in the car, to the few other tall people. Perhaps it’s that usual long view that makes the walling-in especially unpleasant to me.

And I know, for many dealers, it’s been like an arms race. The first to distribute free colorful bookmarks grabbed a lot of notice from potential readers browsing the freebie table. But now there are dozens of those bookmarks, and they can no longer be seen individually (consider trees in a forest). Similarly, the first to have a huge banner behind the table attracted attention from across the room. But now that everyone has one, the banner no longer attracts attention, but only serves as a wall, a backdrop. I try to make my display as low as possible—I’ve stopped using the racks that stand two feet tall on my table—so that I can see my customers and they can see me. (The attached picture is, for example, the Fantastic Books table in the dealers’ room at Arisia 2015.)

I’ve occasionally thought that if I were running a dealers’ room, I would ask vendors the heights of their displays, and then put all the tall displays together in one corner of the room—or at least in the back—and let those with short displays be in the front of the room, so that it would feel more open, larger, for customers walking in to be able to see everything, and for vendors to be able to see them.

My house doesn’t have a front yard, so no fence is necessary. And even though I’m a city dweller, I still like, enjoy, need those open spaces, those long views, that make me feel connected, make me feel a small part of it all, rather than a large resident of a tiny cell. How about you? Are you busily building fences and walls to keep me out?

The Fantastic Books table in the dealers' room of Arisia 2015, feeling pretty walled-in.


Tips gratefully accepted: https://ko-fi.com/ianrandalstrock

Publishing Today: The New Americans #5

After being forced to kill in order to protect their widowed mother, three brothers escape Mafia-controlled Sicily to the New World.

Life for immigrants in America during the second decade of the 1900s is difficult and often harrowing, but that’s the reality into which Peter, John, and Angelu Donatello are thrust when their ship docks in Philadelphia. As Peter tries to make his way in this new land through honest hard work, John’s talents—many learned fighting in the Great War—lead him to the seamier, but potentially more profitable, underworld. And all the while, Angelu, the youngest brother and a true innocent, struggles to just find a place for himself in a world he can never truly understand.

Prohibition may make criminals of honest men, but it also allows poor immigrants to mingle with the upper classes; the Donatellos among them. Yet, despite war and crime, marriage and loneliness, honor and betrayal, the brothers, each in their own way, cling to their creed of Supra tuttu la famigghia: Family is all.

Eventually, everything will lead them back to Sicily, to a confrontation with the forces that have shaped their lives, and to a heart-wrenching reconciliation.

Reminiscent of John Jakes’ Bicentennial series, The New Americans by Tony and Ty Drago is a wonderfully moving saga. The genesis of the story is itself a tale: in his final weeks, Tony Drago tape-recorded what his son Ty thought were simple reminiscences. It was only in the years following Tony’s death, after Ty became an established novelist, that he listened to the tapes and realized his father had left him, not a family history, but rather an emotional novel of immigration, rebirth, and growth. Milherst Publishing is honored to bring this story to the world.

The New Americans, by Tony & Ty Drago, will be released in six monthly installments, as both trade paperbacks and ebooks.

1: Fuggitivi. $10.99, 182 pages, ISBN 978-1-5154-5842-5. February 3, 2026.

2: Strangers in Paradiso. $10.99, 186 pages, ISBN: 978-1-5154-5843-2. March 3, 2026.

3: The Pursuit of Felicita. $10.99, 184 pages, ISBN: 978-1-5154-5844-9. April 7, 2026.

4: The Philly Crew. $12.99, 230 pages, ISBN: 978-1-5154-5845-6. May 5, 2026.

5: A Leaf in the Turning. $12.99, 224 pages, ISBN: 978-1-5154-5846-3. June 2, 2026.

6: The Prodigal Sons. $10.99, 170 pages, ISBN: 978-1-5154-5847-0. July 7, 2025.

Book #5: A Leaf in the Turning

With the arrival of their ne’er-do-well cousin Carlo from Sicily, the Donatellos are thrust into the roles of hosts and caretakers. Unfortunately, Angelu’s loneliness and gentle disposition make him an ideal target for exploitation, from both family and strangers.

A rival bootlegger targets Peter and the company, and inadvertently endangers Sarah. Knowing where his duty lies, Peter resolves to give it all up for her. John, however, demands his brother’s loyalty, calling Peter’s desire to leave the family business “betrayal.” Peter must navigate his conflicted feelings for John, even as Angelu navigates heartbreak and despair. Dealing with Carlo, however, may prove an even bigger challenge for all of them.

Two things make a post

In the olden days, it used to be “three things make a post,” but this is a busy week, so I’m going with two.

Doing the laundry today, I saw once again — and this time decided to comment upon — an oddity. Specifically, all my other clothing, whether it goes into the wash inside out or outside out, tends to come out the same way. But my swim trunks — and only that article of clothing — which goes in outside out, always comes out of the dryer inside out. Trying to figure out why.

Second thing: just got an email from Daniel P. Dern, pointing me at his latest deep DEEP dive, this time into improperly researched cover art (and if you’ve read Robert A. Heinlein’s “The Roads Must Roll,” you’ll know right off what set him off). In that article, he offers a nice mention of my Punctilious Punctuation, along with a suggested addition to take it even deeper in the discussion of ellipses…. It’s a fun, wide-ranging look at good art that utterly fails at being advertising for the story to which it’s attached.

Publication Day: Join the Resistance!

Join the resistance! It’s time to stand up to tyranny, to fight for what’s right, and to read fascinating stories of resistance while supporting the ACLU and ProPublica.

In short, today is publication day for the new anthology, RESISTANCE. Eighteen fascinating science fiction and fantasy tales of fighting for what’s right, standing up to the oppressors, and giving it our all for the best of reasons. All the authors donated their fees for their stories so we could bring you this book. The proceeds from sales of the book will be donated to the ACLU and to ProPublica: organizations which stand up to support civil liberties, accountability, and independent investigative journalism.

Click to the Fantastic Books page for the full table of contents and pointers to where you can buy the book in various formats today!

And even if it’s not your cup of tea, please share this with your friends. Thanks!

A step toward ending government corruption

Unwritten rules are fine, so long as everyone complies with them. But then a person or group comes along—such as the Trump Crime Family—that requires us to put actual words to these unwritten rules to turn them into written law.

And after years of Congressional representatives talking about preventing themselves from trading stocks while not actually doing anything, I think it’s time we the people proposed the law we want. Therefore, as my contribution to the discussion, I offer…

A Law Delineating Emoluments Prohibitions that Were Previously Understood but Unwritten

Section I: People Subject to This Law
1. Elected and appointed members of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Members of the Supreme Court.
3. The President and Vice President of the United States.
4. People appointed by the President, whether confirmed by the Senate or not.
5. People hired or appointed by, or who in the normal course of business report directly to, anyone in lines 1, 2, 3, or 4.
6. People hired or appointed by, or who in the normal course of business report directly to, anyone in line 5.
7. Immediate family members of anyone in lines 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6.

Section II: Prohibited and Required Actions of People in Section I.
1. All people covered by this law are prohibited from buying or selling stocks, bonds, or any other form of ownership of any company, whether publicly traded or privately held.
2. All people covered by this law are required to place all assets in a blind trust.
2.a. Assets with a combined value of less than 50% of the mean personal annual income of the United States may be exempted from this requirement.
2.b. A primary residence may be exempted from this requirement.
2.c. Covered people shall have 30 days from notice of election, appointment, or hiring to a position listed in Section I in order to complete this requirement.
3. All people covered by this law are prohibited from communicating what would be considered “insider information” about any government or business activities to any person or people for financial benefit.

Section III: Penalties for Failure to Comply with This Law
1. Stocks, bonds, or other forms of ownership purchased are subject to forfeiture—in their entirety—to the United States Treasury General Account.
2. Proceeds from sales of stocks, bonds, or other forms of ownership are subject to forfeiture—in their entirety—to the United States Treasury General Account.
3. Assets with a combined value greater than 50% of the mean personal annual income of the United States held outside of a blind trust are subject to forfeiture—in their entirety—to the United States Treasury General Account.
4. Instances of communicating insider information (see Section II, 3) shall be fined at a rate equal to the potential gain enjoyed by the recipients of such communication.

Section IV: Duration of These Requirements
1. People listed in Section I shall be subject to this law during the entire time they hold one of the offices listed in Section I, and for 180 days after leaving such office.
2. Those people in office when this law is adopted shall have 30 days to comply with all the provisions herein.

Science Fiction Convention (2nd of 2025)

After two years of many, many conventions, there seems to be a paucity of them on my 2026 schedule. That makes next weekend (May 22–25) even more exciting: I’ll be at Balticon! (That’s in Baltimore, Maryland.)

As always, if you’re looking for me at the convention, the first place to look is the dealers’ room at the Fantastic Books table—where I expect to have copies of the new anthology Resistance available. We’ll be open Friday from 2 to 7pm, Saturday and Sunday from 10am to 7pm, and Monday from 10am to 2pm. Remember, at Balticon, they hide the dealers’ room behind a lot of vendors in the lobby area, which they call Artists Alley, but in reality, it’s the dealers who pay less for their tables because the area doesn’t lock at night. You’ll have to pass them to find the two dealers’ rooms.

I’ll also be on programming, so you can find me on the following panels:

Friday at 10:00pm in Federal Hill: “Don’t Get Me Started!” with Daniel M. Kimmel, Nomi S, and Jean Marie Ward.

Saturday at 2:30pm in Gibson: “Romanticizing the Monarchy” with Carolyn Ives Gilman, Chidumebi Njoku-Browne, Jennifery R. Povey, and John Robison.

Sunday at 11:30am in Room 7029: “Punctuation and Other Things” with Andrew McDowell, Bjorn E. Hasseler, and D.H. Timpko

Sunday at 4:00pm in Mount Washington: “Publishing AMA: Self Pub and Small Press and Trad, Oh My!” with Joshua Bilmes, Doc Coleman, and Kim Headlee.

Sunday at 7:00pm in Guilford: “75 Years After I, Robot” with Susanne Allen, Tom Doyle, and Mark Painter. I may be a few minutes late for this one, because the dealers’ room closes at 7:00.

Hope to see many of you there, and hope to come home with far fewer books!