Science fiction convention (7th of 2025)

I neglected to post last week (I blame the post-AG recovery period), but this weekend is yet another science fiction convention. I’ll be in Burlington, Massachusetts, for Readercon.

As is typical, I’ll be at the Fantastic Books table in the dealers’ room (working the screwy hours this convention is imposing for no legitimate reason I can find: Friday 3–7pm, Saturday 10am–1pm, Saturday 2–7pm, Sunday 10am–12n, and Sunday 1–3pm). Please come by the table, where we’ll be featuring the debut of Ron Kaiser’s novel, Mystralhaven: The Mossbringer!

If you’re looking for me on programming, I’ll be on several, including one of their “Thursday night free to the public sessions”:

Thursday at 9pm in Salon G/H: “What Time Loops Reveal” with Marianna Martin, Mark Painter, Ken Schneyer, and David G. Shaw.

Friday at 12:30pm: I’ll be giving a reading in Envision/Enliven.

Friday at 5pm in Salon G/H: “Is the Quest Fantasy Dead?” with P. Djeli Clark, Lyndsay Ely, Scott Lynch, and Robert V.S. Redick.

Saturday at 11am in Salon I/J: “Dhalgren at 50” with Gregory Feeley, Jim Freund, Elizabeth Hand, and Ann LeBlanc.

Two weeks, never: whatever

Donald Trump left the G7 summit in Canada early, “because he needed to be close to his advisors in the White House, to decide on our course of action with regard to Israel and Iran.” But once he got home, he decided to maybe make a decision… in two weeks. Honestly, no one should have expected anything sooner, because the only things he acts on today are the internal culture wars he keeps fighting. Real policy decision, things of global import, those are the things that are always “in two weeks,” because he doesn’t want the blame for actually doing something. Remember “I’ll end the war in Ukraine on day one”? Remember “I’ll negotiate trade deals with every country in the world”? Remember “we’ll take over the Gaza Strip and turn it into a tourist destination”? Remember “we need to take over Canada, or Greenland”?

As Jen Psaki very clearly lays out in this segment, “two weeks” is Donald Trump’s version of “I talk big, but I’m not actually going to do anything, and you’ll forget about it.” He’s been “two weeks”ing us since he took office the first time.

I’ve been thinking about his two weeks, and comparing it to Ben Bova’s story “Crisis of the Month.” In Bova’s story, the heads of the news media get together when they realize the public’s attention span for any story peters out after a month, so they need a new story with which to entrance and enrage the public every four weeks. Bova wrote it in 1988, before the internet and the 24-hour news cycle. Apparently, Trump has learned that Bova’s one month span has dropped to two weeks or less, so that by the time his “two weeks” rolls around, we’ve already forgotten whatever it was we needed him to say or do, and we’re on to the next story.

It’s time we realized that when he says “in two weeks,” what he actually means is “I’m not doing anything. Forget it, please.” Or we could just look at his record: he’s done a great deal with executive orders, but none of it is the least bit presidential, none of it is what we elect a president for, and none of it can be taken seriously.

Edited June 21, 2025 at 21:50 EDT: Sure, the one time he decides to act in less than two weeks. Oy.

Fiction Today, Tomorrow, and Hopefully Soon

Three quick announcements from Ian the fiction writer.

One. My latest story, “…a Crack of Lightning, or, The Zen Solipsist Muses Upon His Own Genesis,” is available starting today from Amazing Stories at this link: https://amazingstories.com/2025/06/a-crack-of-lightning-by-ian-randal-strock-free-story/ . Check it out!

Two. Tomorrow, I’m one of the readers at the monthly Brooklyn Books & Booze reading event at Barrow’s Intense Tasting Room, 86 34th Street, in Brooklyn, New York. Admission is free, but it is a bar, and they’re hoping you’ll be thirsty for beverages as well as for great fiction. Hosted by Randee Dawn, the June 17 event will feature me, Clay McLeod Chapman, Meg Ripley, and L. Marie Wood. Festivities start at 7:00 pm, so be there! More details at https://randeedawn.com/bonus/brooklyn-books-booze/

Three. I’ve got a new story, “Infestation: White House,” scheduled to appear in the forthcoming anthology Tales of Galactic Pest Control (edited by David Gerrold and Tom Easton). But in order for it to appear, the winding-up-soon Kickstarter campaign needs a little more push to get to the funding line. If you’re interested in reading the story, reading the book, consider pre-purchasing a copy. And if you can’t lay out the money now, at least please tell your friends about it. I, the editors, and the other authors (it’s an awesome line-up; at least check out the link here to see who else is involved) thank you. The link is https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/galactic-pests/tales-of-galactic-pest-controla-sci-fi-and-fantasy-anthology?ref=discovery&term=galactic%20pest%20control&total_hits=1&category_id=324

Should protests be something more?

Yesterday, I went to the No Kings protest in Manhattan with Mom, her friend, her friend’s son, and his girlfriend. I was part of that massive throng of people you may have seen in some video clip somewhere, looking like a huge movement, a force.

But from my vantage point (about six feet above the ground), it seemed different… smaller. Perhaps I’m missing something, but I feel unfulfilled.

We got off the subway in Times Square, walked to the table on the south side of Bryant Park staffed by the son’s union, picked up signs and chant lyric sheets, and then joined the many, many people walking ever so slowly to Fifth Avenue, and then down Fifth Avenue to 26th Street. During the two-hour walk, I saw a lot of signs—some clever and artistic, many simpler. I heard a lot of chants—most of them rhymed, none of them were truly memorable. I saw a lot of people happy to be there together, despite the rain. And we walked.

And we got to 26th Street, and there were several organizers with a large banner saying, “This is the end of the march. Please disperse east and west. Thanks for coming.” I looked around and thought “That’s it? We came, we walked down Fifth Avenue, and we’re done?”

Perhaps I’m living in the past, but I was expecting some sort of stirring “I Have a Dream” oratory. Some call to action. Some plan to take the might of so many people united and actually do something.

Did I miss something?

Over-reacting to show political strength

In the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode “Shakaar” (season 3, episode 24; first aired May 22, 1995), a new political leader clashes with a political rival over the return of some farming equipment. The rival and his fellow farmers are using the equipment; the leader thinks it would be better used somewhere else. The leader, Kai Winn, asks Major Kira to talk with her friends—Shakaar and the farmers—to return the equipment, thinking that Kira’s prior relationship with them will turn the tide. Kira is unsuccessful, so Winn calls out the militia to take the equipment back by force, deeming Shakaar’s continued reticence a threat to the stability of the government, and a test of her set by the gods. She eventually calls on Commander Sisko to bring Federation forces to support her efforts. Sisko tells her this is an over-reaction, noting that she has done everything to escalate the situation far beyond reason, rather than acting as a leader to calm things down. Eventually, our heroes are able to bring a political counter-punch, and Winn backs down to end the episode.

The whole story is ringing in my ears today as I’m watching the outrageous escalation in Los Angeles, brought about through President Trump’s nationalizing and sending in the National Guard to deal with protests against policies that he himself set. Once again, we’re looking at an outrageous over-reaction apparently designed solely to solidify the over-reactor’s political position. California’s Governor Newsom and Los Angeles’s Mayor Bass have both said there is no need for federal troops to calm the protests, and that they will only inflame the situation. But Trump seems to see it as either a test set by his god, or an opportunity (akin to his forthcoming military parade) to show he is the power, he is the strength, he is the ruler. Once again, he is showing us he has no interest in being the president of a democratic republic, that he would much rather be the strongman in a dictatorship that benefits only himself and his friends.

The situation in Los Angeles is indeed a test. It may be the first volley in a test not unlike the one Abraham Lincoln described in his Gettysburg Address, when he spoke of a nation conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. “Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.” We are engaged in the struggle to guarantee that “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

[Edited a day later to add:]

A friend pointed out to me that I might not have been clear in the above. I wasn’t saying the entire situation started with the call for troops, that that was the only escalation. It was merely the tipping point that prompted me to write.

But the Kai Winn “escalating the situation out of all legitimate proportions,” in the current situation is Donald Trump’s unceasing cries that undocumented farm workers, manual laborers, anyone who speaks Spanish and has slightly more melanin than he is a threat to the United States and our way of life. The crisis he has manufactured began with the terror he tried to instill in us: terror at the presence of the very people he frequently employed in his various real estate businesses. The violation of Posse Comitatus is only the latest step in his long con to make Americans so afraid of anyone other than Trump and his cronies that we allow them to rob us of our fortunes and freedom.

For today’s chilling extension, see Secretary Noem’s comments and actions in this article.

Punctilious Punctuation: a press release and a request for suggestions

It started—as the biggest arguments do—over the smallest of things: the placement of a comma. That turned into an anecdote, and thence into a speech. And now author, editor, and punctuation lover Ian Randal Strock has turned it into a book. Punctilious Punctuation allows each and every one of those little spots and squiggles on the page to shine, with its own chapter covering the history, usage, misusage, and ancillary information of the punctuation marks. Punctuated with stories and anecdotes on the huge impact those tiny marks can have (the $5 million lawsuit, the Russian revolution, and more), Punctilious Punctuation is fully researched, footnoted, illustrated, and—of course—punctuated.

Ian Randal Strock’s three books on presidential history and trivia were published by Random House and Carrel Books. His award-winning science fiction has appeared in Analog, Nature, Amazing, and several anthologies, and some of it has recently been collected in Wandering Through Time. He has presented talks on punctuation, the presidents, and a variety of other topics to Mensa, writers’ groups, science fiction societies, the 99s, university classes, and more. He is the recipient of the 2025 Edward E. Smith Memorial “Skylark” Award, and firmly believes in the utility and necessity of the serial comma.

Punctilious Punctuation: Telling tales with (and of) those jots and tittles, including why they’re called jots and tittles, and the horrifying story of why the period goes inside the quotation marks
by Ian Randal Strock
148 pages, fully illustrated
September 15, 2025
Trade Paperback: ISBN: 978-1-5154-5834-0, $15.99
Case Laminate (library binding): ISBN: 978-1-5154-5837-1, $27.99

Punctilious Punctuation—and all Gray Rabbit Publications books—are distributed via Ingram. Review copies are available upon request.

And the request: where do you find reviews of such non-fiction titles that you appreciate? In the realm of science fiction, I know where to send galleys, but I’m trying to improve my game in non-fiction. Thanks!

Different similarities

I’ve been thinking about the transitive—or is that intransitive?—power of similarity. Specifically, about two years ago, I met a woman who very strongly reminds of another I’ve known for a very long time. They have completely different personalities, so there’s no chance of confusing one for the other, but they look so similar that one might think them sisters.

About a year ago, I mat a third woman who very strongly resembles the second. Again, different personalities, quite clearly different people, but a very similar look.

However, the third woman in no way reminds me of the first. I’m confused. The second woman I met reminds me so strongly of the first that whenever I see her, I do a double-take to confirm her identity. And the third, again, is an equally close match for the second. But whenever I see the third, I can see no similarity with the first.

Harrison Ruffin Tyler, last surviving grandchildren of President John Tyler, dies

Sad news: Harrison Ruffin Tyler has died at the age of 96. Through a family quirk (marrying twice and fathering children late in life), his grandfather was far and away the earliest president to have living grandchildren. Harrison’s father, Lyon Gardiner Tyler, was born in 1853, and died in 1935 (when his son, Harrison, was six years old). Lyon’s first wife died in 1921, after they had three children, and Lyon married Sue Ruffin, who was 35 years younger than he. Lyon and Sue had three more children: Lyon Jr. (1925–2020), Harrison (1928–2025), and Henry, who died in infancy. Lyon’s father was tenth US President John Tyler (born in 1790). John and his first wife, Letitia, had eight children. Letitia died in 1842, a year and a half after President William Henry Harrison died, making Tyler the first vice president to succeed to the presidency. In 1844, Tyler married Julia Gardiner, who was 30 years younger than he. After leaving the White House, they had seven children (Lyon was the fifth). The president died in 1862, when Lyon was eight years old.

In addition to his family pedigree, Harrison lived a full life. After graduating from Virginia Tech, he worked for Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation. He received a patent in water treatment pertaining to shiny aluminum. In 1963, Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation was acquired by Mobil, and Tyler left the company to found ChemTreat, Inc. (a water treatment company headquartered in Glen Allen, Virginia) with partner William P. Simmons. In 2000, Tyler led an employee stock ownership program at his company. ChemTreat was acquired by the Danaher Corporation in 2007.

Tyler married Frances Payne Bouknight in 1957. They had three children: Julia Gardiner Tyler Samaniego (born 1958), Harrison Ruffin Tyler Jr. (born 1960), and William Bouknight Tyler (born 1961).

Tyler purchased the Sherwood Forest Plantation—President Tyler’s home—from relatives in 1975 and oversaw its restoration. In 2001, he donated $5 million and 22,000 books and documents from his father to the College of William & Mary department of history.

Frances died in 2019, and Tyler broke with family tradition by not remarrying. He suffered a series of mini-strokes in 2012, and died in the nursing home where he was living on May 25, 2025.

If thou art god, why art thou pissing off everyone else?

In one of Allen Steele’s Coyote novels, he introduces the alien religion known as Sa Tong Tas, which the humans come to translate as “thou art god.” When first I read it, it was an interesting concept for an ideal world, but I know that I do not live in an ideal world, so it just percolated in the back of my mind.

In the last few days, several real-world experiences have brought this concept to the forefront of my mind. On Thursday, riding the bus home from Boston, the woman behind me did not stop pulling on the back of my seat, except for the hour and a half she was speaking loudly on her speaker phone in a foreign language. It was only as we were arriving in New York that I realized she was not being malicious; she simply did not think about the fact that her actions affected anyone else.

Saturday morning, at the convention hotel, I went swimming. There was one woman in the pool when I got there, but she left soon after I arrived. I met her Saturday evening, and she explained that she had to get out because the water had become too rough while I was swimming. I try not to flail about or splash or make a big production of my swimming, and she said it was not my conscious fault, but I am a large person, and when swimming at my regular speed, I tend to leave a wake. In a smaller hotel pool, that wake reflects off the walls of the pool, interfering and combining to make larger waves and splashes. Sunday morning, while I was swimming by myself, I tried to be a bit more conscious of what I was doing to the surface of the water, and realized that I do tend to swim fairly smoothly, but indeed, I’m leaving a wake. There is not much I can do about this other than not swim, but now I will be more conscious of how my swimming affects others.

The reason I am writing this is because of an incident that occurred Saturday night at a party at the convention. I was talking with a writer, new to me, who is very successful. He has about two dozen books in print, and makes six figures a year from his writing. He was giving me advice and suggestions and talking about the business, which could have been extremely valuable to me. The problem, however, was that a struggling writing also joined in the conversation. It wasn’t the art of writing we were talking about; it was the business, which comes after the writing is done. The successful writer’s method was to describe a problem he’d encountered, a hurdle to overcome, a general condition that interferes with success, and then to talk about what he’d learned, how he overcame the problem, what he does to be successful. Unfortunately for me—and for the struggling writer himself—the struggling writer heard the problem, and then felt the need to interrupt to detail his own form of the problem and why it was so vitally important to solve it. If the struggling writer had realized the successful writer was offering some of the potential solutions the struggling writer was seeking, the struggling writer might have clammed up, and both he and I could have benefitted from the successful writer’s willingness to share his accumulated wisdom. Instead, by not noticing how his actions affected anyone outside himself, he deprived us both of a fantastic chance to learn to be more successful.

I’m not saying we should diminish ourselves for others’ benefits. But simply realizing that no action occurs in a vacuum, that what we do—consciously or not—affects others may cause us to think about those others, may make the world a better place (and incidentally, benefit ourselves in the long run).

N.B. — This is not directed at anyone with whom I may have had a telephone conversation during the past week.

“Pairs” of Songs

Working with music playing—as I always do—I’m thinking about paired songs. That is, songs that go together (at least in my mind), but weren’t necessarily released together. So, not “We Will Rock You” and “We Are the Champions” by Queen, not “Hard to Say I’m Sorry” and “Getaway” by Chicago. I’m thinking of “I Know You’re Out There Somewhere” by the Moody Blues and “When You Close Your Eyes” by Night Ranger, or “Scary Kisses” by Voice of the Beehive and “Kiss Me Deadly” by Lita Ford.

Got any other interesting pairs of songs that really ought to go together?